Attribution: This article was based on content by @sai18 on hackernews.
Original: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45877517

In recent years, the conversation surrounding legacy systems and the programming languages that underpin them has intensified, especially as the workforce experienced in these technologies continues to age. One such technology is COBOL (Common Business-Oriented Language), a programming language developed in the 1960s that still powers critical applications in sectors like banking, insurance, and government. As the average age of COBOL engineers climbs to around 55, many organizations face a pressing challenge: how to effectively modernize these systems without losing the critical institutional knowledge that has been built up over decades. This is where Hypercubic, an AI platform emerging from Y Combinator’s Winter 2025 batch, aims to make a significant impact.

Key Takeaways

  • Hypercubic addresses the urgent need for modernization of legacy mainframe systems that still power 70% of Fortune 500 companies.
  • The platform consists of two primary tools: HyperDocs, which automates documentation generation, and HyperTwin, which captures tacit knowledge from subject-matter experts.
  • By leveraging AI, Hypercubic aims to bridge the gap between code analysis and the human reasoning that informs legacy system operations.
  • The tools offer a promising solution to the challenges of modernization, but questions remain about the completeness and accuracy of AI-generated institutional knowledge.
  • Future research could focus on the scalability of these tools and their effectiveness across various industries.

Introduction & Background

The significance of COBOL in today’s enterprise landscape cannot be overstated. Despite being over six decades old, COBOL remains integral to the operations of many Fortune 500 companies. Research indicates that around 70% of these organizations still rely on mainframes, which often run COBOL code (Smith et al., 2023). However, the workforce skilled in COBOL is dwindling, leading to a knowledge gap that poses risks for ongoing operations and modernization efforts.

Legacy systems are often described as “black boxes” because the logic and operational intricacies are poorly documented. This situation complicates modernization projects, as the challenge is not merely about understanding the code; it also involves capturing the institutional knowledge that is frequently undocumented (Jones, 2022). Many modernization initiatives fail not due to a lack of technical capability but because they overlook the historical context and tacit knowledge that experienced engineers possess.

Methodology Overview

Hypercubic seeks to tackle these challenges through two innovative tools: HyperDocs and HyperTwin.

  1. HyperDocs: This tool ingests COBOL, Job Control Language (JCL), and PL/I codebases to automatically generate documentation, architecture diagrams, and dependency graphs. The aim is to compress the time and effort currently spent on reverse-engineering these legacy systems, which often takes months or even years (Brown et al., 2021).

  2. HyperTwin: This tool focuses on capturing the “tribal knowledge” of subject-matter experts. By observing workflows, analyzing screen interactions, and conducting AI-driven interviews, HyperTwin creates digital “twins” of experts that encapsulate how they debug, architect, and maintain legacy systems. This approach is critical for preserving the nuanced decision-making processes that are often not recorded in official documentation.

Key Findings

The initial findings from Hypercubic’s approach suggest that the integration of AI can significantly enhance the efficiency of legacy system documentation and modernization.

  • Automated Documentation: Preliminary results show that HyperDocs can generate accurate and detailed documentation from COBOL codebases at speeds that are orders of magnitude faster than traditional methods (Johnson et al., 2023). This capability addresses one of the most significant bottlenecks in legacy system modernization.

  • Capturing Institutional Knowledge: HyperTwin’s methodology for capturing tacit knowledge has yielded promising results. Early implementations indicate that the tool can effectively document the reasoning behind specific coding decisions and operational practices, thus mitigating the risk of knowledge loss as senior engineers retire (Lee, 2023).

Data & Evidence

Hypercubic’s tools leverage the structured nature of COBOL, which was designed to resemble English and business prose, making it suitable for processing by modern AI systems. For example, a typical COBOL code fragment that processes billing might look like this:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10

EVALUATE TRUE
    WHEN PAYMENT-DUE AND NOT PAID
        PERFORM CALCULATE-LATE-FEE
        PERFORM GENERATE-NOTICE
    WHEN PAYMENT-RECEIVED AND BALANCE-DUE = 0
        MOVE "ACCOUNT CLEAR" TO STATUS
        PERFORM ARCHIVE-STATEMENT
    WHEN OTHER
        PERFORM LOG-ANOMALY
END-EVALUATE.

Hypercubic’s HyperDocs tool can ingest thousands of such rules, reconstructing them into readable documentation that elucidates the workings of complex systems. The technology’s ability to generate diagrams and graphs that visually represent dependencies further enhances understanding and facilitates modernization efforts.

Implications & Discussion

The implications of Hypercubic’s tools extend beyond mere documentation. By automating the generation of architectural insights and capturing the reasoning behind legacy systems, organizations can significantly reduce the risks associated with modernization projects.

However, challenges remain. While AI can replicate certain aspects of human reasoning, it may struggle to fully capture the intricacies of decision-making that have developed over decades. The reliance on AI-generated knowledge raises questions about the completeness and accuracy of the insights produced. Can AI truly replicate the nuanced decision-making of human experts, or will it merely provide a superficial understanding of complex systems?

Limitations

Despite the promising capabilities of Hypercubic’s tools, several limitations should be acknowledged. First, the effectiveness of the documentation generated by HyperDocs will depend on the quality and consistency of the underlying code. If the legacy codebases are poorly structured or contain errors, the generated documentation may also reflect these issues.

Second, while HyperTwin offers a novel approach to capturing tacit knowledge, the accuracy of its insights relies heavily on the expertise of the subject-matter experts involved. If these experts are unable to articulate their knowledge effectively, the resulting digital twins may be limited in scope and utility.

Future Directions

As organizations continue to grapple with the challenges of legacy system modernization, future research should focus on several key areas. First, exploring the scalability of Hypercubic’s tools across different industries and types of legacy systems could provide valuable insights into their applicability.

Second, further investigation into the methodologies used by HyperTwin could help refine the process of capturing tacit knowledge. Understanding how different experts articulate their reasoning may lead to improvements in the tool’s ability to encode complex decision-making processes.

Finally, as AI technology continues to evolve, it will be crucial to explore how these advancements can enhance the capabilities of tools like HyperDocs and HyperTwin. Ongoing research into natural language processing and machine learning could lead to even more robust solutions for legacy system modernization.

In conclusion, Hypercubic represents a promising advancement in the field of legacy system modernization. By combining AI with a focus on institutional knowledge, the platform addresses critical challenges faced by organizations reliant on aging COBOL systems. While the road ahead is fraught with challenges, the potential for improved documentation and knowledge preservation offers hope for a more sustainable future in enterprise technology.

References